Lesson 3 Tutorial

Q: (i) What is meant by ‘mixed oxide’ fuel? (ii) Compare the pros and cons of oxide fuel against metallic fuel. (iii) Why are mixed oxides used in commercial reactors rather than mixed metals?

A:

(i) Mixed oxide (MOX) fuel is nuclear fuel that contains a mixture of plutonium dioxide (PuO2_2) and uranium dioxide (UO2_2). Typically the plutonium content is around 5—10% by weight, with the remainder being (usually depleted or natural) uranium oxide. MOX allows plutonium separated during reprocessing to be recycled as reactor fuel.

(ii) Oxide fuel (UO2_2/MOX) compared to metallic fuel (U metal):

PropertyOxide fuel (UO2_2/MOX)Metallic fuel (U metal)
Melting pointVery high (~2,865 °C for UO2_2) — a major safety advantageLower (~1,132 °C for U metal)
Chemical stabilityExcellent — does not react readily with water or airReactive — uranium metal corrodes in water and can ignite in air
Thermal conductivityRelatively low — limits heat transfer from pellet centre to claddingHigher — better heat transfer
Uranium densityLower (fewer uranium atoms per unit volume because of the oxygen)Higher (more uranium per unit volume)
Radiation stabilityGood — retains structural integrity under irradiationProne to swelling and dimensional change under irradiation
Cladding compatibilityGoodCan have compatibility issues

(iii) MOX fuel can be used in reactors that were originally designed for UO2_2 fuel (most PWRs and BWRs) with relatively minor modifications. This allows stockpiled separated plutonium from reprocessing to be consumed, reducing the proliferation risk of holding large inventories.

A metallic alloy of uranium and plutonium can be used as nuclear fuel, and some experimental fast-reactor fuels have been metallic alloys (e.g. EBR-II in Idaho). However, metallic fuels have the disadvantages listed above (lower melting point, corrosion, dimensional instability), and they are not compatible with the standard thermal-reactor designs that dominate the global fleet. For these reasons oxide fuels (including MOX) are overwhelmingly preferred for commercial power reactors.

End of Chapter 3